Skip to main content

Republic V: the Argument from Knowledge

DateTopicSpeaker
2011
December 2“When Do Things Die” Dr. Cody Gilmore, assistant professor of philosophy at University of California at Davis
December 3“What Do Quantifiers and Variables Contribute?”Dr. Cody Gilmore, assistant professor of philosophy at University of California at Davis
August 26“Zarathustra's Metaethics”Dr. Neil Sinhababu, National University of Singapore
August 27“The Gap Between Thought and Ought”Dr. Neil Sinhababu, National University of Singapore
April 15“Mathematics: Discovered or Invented?”Dr. Kit Fine, Silver Professor of Philosophy and Mathematics at New York University
2010
April 27“Priority Ensemblism”Dr. Joshua Spencer, Syracuse University
March 12“Can Science Disprove the Existence of God?"Dr. Peter van Inwagen, is the John Cardinal O’Hara Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame
March 13“Causation and the Mental”Dr. Peter van Inwagen, is the John Cardinal O’Hara Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame
November 13“Responding Rationally to Religions Disagreement"Dr. Samuel Ruhmkorff, Bard College at Simon’s Rock
November 13"How the Pessimistic Induction Begs the Question”Dr. Samuel Ruhmkorff, Bard College at Simon’s Rock
2009
September 10"Tracing and Epistemic Condition on Moral Responsibility"Dr. Kevin Timpe, Northwest Nazarene University
May 9"Evolutionary Ethics and Wager Arguments"Dr. Zac Ernst, University of Missouri-Columbia
May 8"Two Composition Problems in Action"Dr. Sara Chant, University of Missouri-Columbia
April 17"An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design"Dr. Bradley Monton, University of Colorado
April 18 "Against Multiverse Theodicies"Dr. Bradley Monton, University of Colorado
2008
December 5"Endless Hierarchies and Morally Perfect Beings"Dr. Brian Kierland, Boise State University
November 21"Why Water Isn’t H2O"Dr. Ken Dickey, Boise State University
2006
October 27"Perspectives in Imaginative Engagement with Fiction" Dr. Elisabeth Camp, University of Pennsylvania
October 28 "Poesis without Metaphor" Dr. Elisabeth Camp, University of Pennsylvania
2005
December 6"The Ethics of a Politically Correct Christmas"Mr. Jim Stockton, Boise State University
November 11"Colloquium on Endangered Species"Speakers: Mr. Jon Marvel, Executive Director,
Western Watersheds Project
Mr. Laird Lucas Attorney & Executive Director,
Advocates for the West
Dr. Tony Roark, Boise State University
Dr. Andrew Schoedinger, Boise State University
Organized by Dr. Erin Anchustegui, Boise State University
April 21"Intrinsic Vale and Intrinsic Properties"Dr. Josh Parsons, Univeristy of Califormia at Davis
April 22"Some New Zeno Puzzles"Dr. Josh Parsons, Univeristy of Califormia at Davis
April 8"Who's your Daddy?"Dr.Donald C. Hubin, Ohio State University
April 9"Responsibility for Dependent Life" Dr.Donald C. Hubin, Ohio State University
February 18"The Gap of Between Art and Life"Dr. Arthur C. Danto, Emeritus Johnsonian Professor of
Philosophy, Columbia University
2004
November 18"Protecting Public Lands from Federally-Funded Abuses by Ranchers"Mr. Jon Marvel, Western Watersheds Project
September 1"The Saints of Non-Violence: Christ, Gandhi, and Buddha"Dr. Nick Gier, University of Idaho (emeritus)
February 27"How to Lose your Leg … Without Paradox"Dr. Mark Heller, Southern Methodist University
February 28 "The Conventionality of the 3-D/4-D Debate"Dr. Mark Heller, Southern Methodist University
2003
May 2-3"The Essentialist Nominalism of John Buridan, and Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: the Case of John Buridan"Dr. Gyula Klima, Fordham University
April 25" The Quick Talk"Dr. Hud Hudson, Western Wasington University
March 30"Vague, So Untrue"Dr. Theodor Sider, Rutgers University
March 31"A New Grandfather Paradox?"Dr. Theodor Sider, Rutgers University
2002
April12"Truth in Fiction: The Whole Story"Dr. Frances Howard-Snyder, Western Washington University
March 15"Oppression and Epistemic Advantage: Why The View is Better From The Margins"Dr. Audre Brokes, St. Joseph’s University
March 16"The Reference Class Problem and Direct Inference"Dr. Audre Brokes, St. Joseph’s University
2001
October 9"Is It Stupid To Believe In God?"Speakers: Dr. Ken Sanderson, Professor and Chair,
Department of English; Rabbi Daniel Fink, Ahavath Beth Israel and
Saikat Guha, Philosophy Major.
April 20"Inexplicable Contingency: Is There Any Explanation For Why Things That Could Have Been Otherwise Are the Way They Are?"Dr. Hud Hudson, Western Washington University
April 21"Nothing But Dust and Ashes"Dr. Hud Hudson, Western Washington University
March 10"Touching"Dr. Hud Hudson, Western Washington University
2000
October 20"Notre Dame, Can Science Disprove the Existence of God?"Dr. Peter van Inwagen, John Cardinal O’Hara
Professor of Philosophy, Notre Dame
October 21"What Do We Refer to When We Say ‘I’?"Dr. Peter van Inwagen, John Cardinal O’Hara
Professor of Philosophy, Notre Dame
1999
October 29" Morality & the Limits of Technology"Dr. Clarence Johnson, Middle Tennessee University
1998
November 13"The Ethics of Physician Assisted Suicide"Dr. Ralph Baergen, Idaho State University
November 14"Eptisemic Internalism"Dr. Ralph Baergen, Idaho State University
March 11" A Sound Argument Concerning Existence of God"Dr. Hud Hudson, Western Washington University
1997
April 25"St. Augustine: Rhetoric and Religion in Roman North Africa"Prof. Paul Beddoe, St. Andrews University
February 27"Creationism vs. Evolutionism."Dr. Andrew B. Schoedinger & Reverend B. Fisher,
Boise State University
1996
March 8"Inevitable Factual, Legal & Moral Errors: A Case Against the Death Penalty"Prof. Jeff Johnson, Eastern Oregon State
March 9"Hare’s Internalism"Mr. Patrick Beach M.A., Boise State University
February 6"Something Pertaining to Philosophy & Mathematics"Dr. Randall Holmes, Boise State University
1995
November 17"Does Technological Progress Prove Our Cosmology to be True?"Dr. Charles Huenemann, Utah State University
October 20"Advance Directives for Medical Care: What Are Our Goals and Why Aren’t We Achieving Them?"Dr. Ralph Baergen, Idaho State University
March 17"How to Read Philosophy: An Easy Introduction to Foucault and Derrida"Dr. Terry Mazurak, Albertson College
February 6"Plato & Friendship"Dr. Mary Karol Taylor, Montana St. University
1994
March 19"A Multidisciplinary Look at Biotechnological Advances"Philosophy/Psychology/Psy Chi/Psy Honorary
1993
December 3"Moderated Philosophy Club & Campus Crusade for Christ, Freethought Society"[McLuggage/Brandt]Dr. Alan Brinton, Boise State University
1990
October 29"Pain and Ethical Naturalism [The Good, The Bad & The Ugly]"Dr. Andrew B. Schoedinger, Dr. Alan Brinton
and Dr. Warren Harbison, Boise State University
April 10"The Phenomenology of Stupidity as a Factor in Argument and Ethos"Dr. Laurence Rosenfield, Queens College
of the City University of New York
March 18"The Great Showdown"Dr. Andrew B. Schoedinger and Dr. Ed McLuskie,
Boise State University
Other
February 15, 1989"Idealism in Descartes & Malebranch"Dr. Russell Wahl, Idaho State University
June 10, 1988"Values Implicit in the Concept of Suicide," and Hume’s Birthday all nighters to see “if the sun will truly rise.”Dr. Michael J. Wreen, Marquette University

Q:  How does fallibility fit into the picture?
A:  Perceptible objects are not epistemically fit to be proper objects of knowledge because (cf. 477a, 479a):
They aren’t purely (eilikrinosF—i.e., they aren’t simply or unqualifiedly F (cf. Phaedo).
They aren’t completely (pantelosF—i.e., they are subject to change.

The Argument from Knowledge

  1.  If it’s possible that S knows that x is F, then x is purely and completely F. [Premise – stipulative condition on knowledge]
  2. If there is nothing that is purely and completely whatever it is, then knowledge is impossible. [1]
  3. But knowledge is possible. [Premise]
  4. Thus, there is something that is purely and completely F. [2, 3]
  5. But no perceptible object is purely and completely F. [Premise—cf. 479a,b]
  6. Hence, for every property F that can figure in a case of genuine knowledge, there is something that is purely and completely F (call it the “Form of F-ness”), distinct from any perceptible object, that is the object of knowledge concerning F-ness. [4, 5]