SERP Frameworks
Our COAS SERP centers on two frameworks that are essential to the larger vision:
- With Collective Impact as our guide, we resist the template of isolation and defensiveness and instead embrace the power of the collective. Members of collective impact networks aim to “advance equity by learning together, aligning, and integrating their actions to achieve systems-level change.”
- Through Targeted Universalism, we make a commitment to prioritizing needs assessment before action. Our year-long training and planning process allows adequate time for goal-setting, data disaggregation, analysis of structural barriers and the design of strategies that target key structural gaps.
Example Strategic Planning Resource: The Tamarack Collective Impact Toolkit
Needs assessment and planning
Disaggregated retention data helps us to identify which groups are in need of attention, but it does not provide any magical answers as to why some student groups are performing better than others and what interventions are needed. Compiling equity gap data is one step in a larger process of needs assessment and strategy planning. Needs assessment involves a number of research strategies, including the identification and examination of existing qualitative data (e.g., student surveys, focus groups); review of existing research on underrepresented students and promising practices; and the design and implementation of additional data collection efforts. Ideally, these research activities are conducted in collaboration with students who are members of the groups in focus.
Example Strategic Planning Resource: Knowing our Students: Understanding & Designing for Success (Achieving the Dream Guidebook)
High-Impact Practices and evidence-based strategies
Once we have a better understanding of particular groups’ experiences— the barriers they’ve faced and the supports they need— we can move to designing targeted interventions. The recommendation here is to focus on changes to structures, rather than isolated efforts that impact a small number of students. High Impact Practices (HIPs) have been found to improve retention, particularly for underserved student populations, primarily because they are designed to address structural barriers and can be scaled across a department or university. In addition, a number of evidence-based strategies, such as peer mentoring and success coaching, have received attention more recently as effective interventions for students at risk of stopping out.
Example Strategic Planning Resource: Achieving the Dream’s Teaching and Learning Toolkit
Implementation guides
Drawing on the field of public health, we will also explore resources from the research domain of Implementation Science, which focuses on the adoption and integration of evidence-based strategies in real-world contexts. Although the focus of this field is primarily on evidence-based practices and in healthcare settings, the frameworks and tools have relevance to higher education. Implementation Science recognizes that the adoption of evidence-based strategies is not an easy or straightforward process; it requires careful planning, monitoring and evaluation.
Example Strategic Planning Resource: Implementation Science at a Glance (NIH/NCI Guide)